SolarPanels.ReportSolar offers, rules and payback, state by state

Lease, PPA, loan or cash: which is cheaper in 2026?

Since buyers lost the federal tax credit, leases and PPAs often cost less per kWh than buying. But they're long contracts, and the details decide whether you save.

Checked November 12, 2026

CashLoanLeasePPAPrepaid lease or PPA
You own itYesYesNoNoNo
You payAll up frontMonthly, with interestA monthly amountFor each kWh it makesA lump sum up front
Federal credit in 2026NoneNoneThe owner's, may lower your priceThe owner's, may lower your priceThe owner's, may lower your price
Price goes up each yearNoNoOften, by the escalatorOften, by the escalatorNo
RepairsYours, after warrantiesYours, after warrantiesUsually the owner'sUsually the owner'sUsually the owner's
Selling the houseAdds valuePay it off or transferBuyer takes it over, or buy it outBuyer takes it over, or buy it outUsually transfers

What the 2026 numbers show

On EnergySage's marketplace in the first half of 2026, a prepaid lease cost about 39% less per kWh than a cash purchase, and a prepaid PPA about 57% less. Traditional PPAs were cheaper per kWh than solar loans, but buying with cash still beat a traditional monthly PPA by about a third. The median cash quote was $2.57 per watt.

The reason is the tax credit: the company that owns a leased system can still claim 30% of its cost (for systems in service by the end of 2027), and buyers can't. Whether you see that saving depends on the price you're quoted.

How to compare any two offers

Turn each one into a cost per kWh: everything you'll pay, divided by everything the system will make over the contract. Then compare it with what that power saves on your bill. Check a quote

When each makes sense

Sources: EnergySage: six months after the tax credit ended; pv magazine USA: residential solar prices rise as third-party ownership gains ground; Solar.com: the 30% tax credit for leases and PPAs.